The Final Report Card On Genetic IQ Differences And Race

First published on Medium.

.

There is a mono-color-cultural connection to race and IQ science. For some reason, those scientists, of a certain race, who purport its reality have gotten their inspiration, and even some of their data and ideas, handed down directly from the fascist philosophers, and racist pseudo-scientists of the past. How is it possible that today’s mono-color-culturalist scientists come up with the same results their totally oblivious-to-real-science, idiot ancestors came up with using laughingly limited samplings, and ridiculously childish stereotypes?

.

There is something wrong right here in River of Racism Runs Through It IQ Science-city. Therefore, we need to do a comparison of two race and intelligence theorizing groups, separated by over 300 years, and massive technological differences, coming up with the same basic determination.

.

The first group are know nothing, mono-color-culture, scientific savant-idiot ancestors. They derive their data from sketchy, ill-informed books, very limited, or no interaction with their study subjects, thinking a lot about basically zero to do with reality, and then they use their pathetic data to retroactively justify discriminatory practices, like slavery, and Jim Crow.

.

The second group is 21st century ignorant about race, and arrogant about their mono-color-culturalist superiority. They are the psychologists, geneticists, and other IQ science researchers who supposedly use the most advanced technology, and data development strategies, to determine that IQ is inheritable. That means the more melanin, or closer to African ancestry you are, the lower your IQ. Of course, this is not a racist coincidence; it is pure, white male peer (mostly), whitewashing pure, snow white science.

.

The odds of both the first AND second group arriving at the same racist perspective on intelligence is 400 years of substandard deviations off-the-nut of likely. Yes, it is not science or a coincidence. We just need to think of how whitey male pillager, and plunderer has placed himself at the heap’s top for half a millennia.

.

Check out some of the first barely scientific, savant-idiots who jumped out of the race and IQ potential data clown car contraption, and begat the same trapdoor, racist tropes, our modern mono-color-culturalist scientists still fall in line with:

.

Scottish surgeon, John Hunter (1728–1793) thought originally the Negroid race was white at birth.

English physician and surgeon Charles White (1728–1813) believed races occupied different stations in the “Great Chain of Being”. He believed that whites and Negroes were two different species, and polygeny: that each race had been created separately.

German polygenist, Christoph Meiners (1747–1810) believed each race had a separate origin. Meiner studied the physical, mental and moral characteristics of each race, and built a race hierarchy based on his findings. Meiners put humans into two groups, labelled the “beautiful white race” and the “ugly black race”.

.

What I wanted to do, to more solidly make my point, and close the case of the science of IQ racism, is to show the linkage of one scientist to the next over time. As the lists proceeds towards today, linkage begins a little fuzzy, but in the last one hundred and fifty years, it is much more evident how their racist focused results, and ideas leapfrogged from one scientistto the next. The scientists, if we can call them that, have discovered almost nothing, but what they wanted, needed, or were programmed to find.

.

Their misunderstanding of racism in this nation is almost entirely complete. Few IQ geneticists have done more than cursory historical discovery of racism and caste. The narrowness of their pursuit has kept us driving down the same road mono-color-culturalists of America have driven previous scientific, savant-idiots of racialized, intelligence studies.

.

Some researchers try to wriggle out by saying, “Once we get the ‘real’ data, we can help people.” I reprise the Reagan adage in scientific form, “The fifteen most terrifying words the mono-color-culture speaks are: I’m from the white-privileged scientific, race-IQ studies department, and I’m here to help.”

.

Before I get to the meat of the gray matter, know that after the meat, in the pre-conclusion, I will discuss other topics associated with my hypothesis and hyperbole. For example, should the truth be stifled? Doth I assess too much? What if IQ differences by race are actually true? What are scientists getting wrong, and how? Do mono-color-culture people really suck as much as it seems? Where does the mono-color-culture want to take us? Why are these mono-color-culturalists so persistent? Did Japheth not like Ham, or was his brother kosher to him? And other tales of their evolutionary tails.

.

Fully Emptying The Clown Car, Nearly.

Ironically, the understanding of evolution by these Race-IQ, scientists is very poor. It is simple to see where they and their ideas evolved from. The rocks I turn over are well worn, with shameful scorn. These scientific racist plagiarists are descendants of flatulent phrenologists, and other foul air erudite mystics. While my attitude may seem harsh, you have not seemed anything yet.

.

Let me introduce my cast of heritable character assassinations, and racial caricature propagation. Since I alluded to the Curse of Ham above, I will continue my bible literacy lesson with my list of dudes, mostly.

.

The tree of racist knowledge has no King David (balm of Gilead poplars) ancestry, except for my wikipedia linked 18th century born racists noted above. It has tangential off shoots, and contributors, and some with direct horrible connections, others only somewhat aligned, and some having no reason to be maligned. However, this group basically has a direct line of succession and racism possession.

.

Philosophic, as well as Homespun, Paternalistic Racism

Begot;

John Locke (1632–1704) Scottish fascist philosophe, monetary racist, his quotes below;

David Hume (1711–1776) Also a Scottish fascist philosophe, and monetary racist;

Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) German fascist philosophe;

. 

Richard Nisbet (1725–1799?) in 1773 wrote his Defense of Slavery book.

. 

Edward Long (1734–1813) 1774 Wrote History of Jamaica, enslaver, planter.

Begot;

.

Transitional Figure from homespun racism to scientific racism.

John C. Calhoun (1782–1850) enslaver, wrote, Slavery, a Positive Good, link to book ideas;

Begot;

Scientific Racism, But Non-Data Driven

.

Begot;

George Combe (1788–1858) contemporary of Knox, knew him;

.

Robert Knox (1791–1862) influenced Darwin;

. 

Samuel George Morton (1799–1851) Influenced Aggassiz, and Hrdlička; 

 .

Josiah Clark Nott (1804–1873) American surgeon and anthropologist;

. 

George Robbins Gliddon (1809–1857) English-born American Egyptologist;

 .

Jean Louis Rodolphe Agassiz (1807–1873) Contemporary of Darwin, Knox, use name link to "quoted" material;

 

Carl Vogt (1817–1895) polygenesist, worked with Agassiz, and contemporary of Darwin;

 

Sir Francis Galton (1822–1911) Influenced by Darwin and Knox;

 

Dr. James Hunt (1833–1869) influenced by Knox, link to "quoted" material;

 

Aleš Hrdlička (1869–1943) Influenced by Morton, Image: Hrdlička gradually came out of the racist fog, but he supplied white supremacists with continued power;

 

Begot;

Transitional Figure from scientific racism to “Intelligent” Design Racism…

William McDougall (1871–1938) Psychologist, worked directly with Galton, influenced Cyril Burt;

Begot;

“Intelligent” Design Racism, IQ Tested, White Male Bias Driven

Begot:

Cyril Burt (1883–1971) Eugenics society, developed erroneous data, Influenced by McDougall;

 

Sewall Wright (1889–1988) Contemporary of Fisher, used Burt’s data, click name to "quoted" material;

Ronald A. Fisher (1890–1962) Contemporary of Wright, racist, eugenicist, also bought by tobacco companies;

 

Hans Jürgen Eysenck (1916–1997) Burt was his doctoral advisor;

 

Arthur Jensen (1923–2012) Used Burt And Sewall’s data;

 

James Dewey Watson (born 1928) of Watson/Crick DNA double-helix fame, influenced most everybody older than him, see quotes below;

. 

Richard Lynn (born 1930) Also used Burt’s data, spoke at American Renaissance “white supremacist” events;

 

James Flynn (1934–2020) Is tangential, but has a connection to Jensen;

 

John Philippe Rushton (1943–2012) Psychologist, Pioneer Fund mega-star;

 

Charles Murray (born 1943) Infamous author of The Bell Curve, has connections to racist Pioneer Fund, others, no quote, see his book.

. 

Christopher Richard Brand (1943–2017) Racist, sexist, researcher, Jensen follower, influenced by Rushton, Lynn, others;

 

Linda Susanne Gottfredson (born 1947) She is connected with the Pioneer Fund, and Rushton;

.

Stefan Molyneux (born 1966) Canadian white nationalist / supremacist goon, promotes Pioneer Fund data, he interviewed Gottfredson. 

Jared Taylor (Not a scientist) American Renaissance editor, standard, white supremacist, racist, elitist, has Gottfredon’s IQ ideas, interviewed by Molyneux;

.

This trail of smears is not a coincidence. White people beget racist, genetic IQ shit. They have linked up for centuries, barely changing their whitewashing tune. And as this list of racial character assassins are allowed to subsist in the university or corporate setting, and influence science, they will beget more violent, white supremacist activities, and continue to disrupt and slow down our acceptance of, and acclimation to, diversity.

.

Weaved Together Durability of White Supremacy.

Few of the scientists mentioned above in the last or third grouping, were, or are, vicious racist, demagogues. James Flynn may be the only one without a deep set white supremacy mindset. That said, their direct or tangential connections are partly how science and learning has always worked. Those connective influences can be both valuable and damaging. Of course, just because a great scientist had a few or many bad, even horrible ideas, does not mean we throw their babies out with their whitewashing. But, we must, throw out the whitewashing.

.

For example, Darwin’s work, which I left out of my list since most scientists in this field, after 1860, have connections to his work, is haunted by very dangerous and derogatory speculations on race. Though most elements of his Natural Selection theory still hold up. Unfortunately, one of the two scientists who discovered the double-helix DNA, and thought Darwin was the most important person ever, is also a truth believer in IQ racist science.

.

“There’s a difference on the average between blacks and whites in IQ tests. I would say the difference is genetic.” — James Watson, 2019 PBS documentary American Masters: Decoding Watson.

.

Is Watson a virulent racist? Though I do not think he is, I have never done a MRI to see if he has a racist bone in his body. However, by being his ignorant, white-privileged self, he spoke like a white supremacist rube about some IQ findings he had skimmed over using his racially biased magnifier. Like many white people, Watson does not really know how his science, scientific racism, and philosophical fascism, homespun racism has all been woven together.

.

Did you notice how the stream of conscious, and subconscious, biased, racist science has always been correct, from Locke to Watson? Africans have always been seen, perceived, and now fully scienced as inferior. How were white, no research done, flapping-jaws philosophes in the 17th century, like John Locke, already so good at pointing out black inferiority, and knowing it was completely correct, even before they pulled out their Tricorder transmission electron microscopes? White people, who have a heritable slave whipping, and property groping and raping, genetic disorder, were so damn smart back then!

Maybe Locke actually discovered the double helix, and that is why he knew his bullshit was correct.

.

How were christians able to approve of slavery? Because it was in the Bible, right? Yes and no, both the Enlightenment philosophe, and anti-Enlightenment scripturalist were stealing from the huge money pot slavery delivered. Then their christian, and “free” market ideas generated the self fulfilling prophecy of just-in-time science of sordid sorts to retroactively justify it. Science in the name of capitalism, never goes wrong! The “free” market is self correcting; like a racist caused (civil) war correction helps capitalism on the other side. I guess massive money can be made legally, and faithfully, when the devil (philosophe) is involved, or when the anti-christ (scripturalist) is.

.

Jim Crow Science Plants Seeds For IQ Racism.

As the abolishment of slavery was ramping up toward war, scientific racism got its foothold to make sure racial inferiority falsehoods would continue to be fostered. The South showed the bible was a weak sister to science because with it christians could support slavery by another name, Jim Crow. Pulling this technicalized version of its peculiar institution from its white supremacist ass made possible the 20th century of cultural genocide. Black Americans can be disenfranchised, raped, even lynched, merely due to their designation as inferior by phony, fucking science fraudster, phrenologists. That is science of head bumps you can believe in, whitey!

.

Guess what, larger brain and skull size (a.k.a. craniometry) also equals superiority, therefore the Constitution, and its new Amendments do not really apply to you who are not of such proper, cranium credibility. What happens when a philosophe, a scripturalist, a craniometrist, and a phrenologist meet in a bar? The 21st century, genetic IQ science racist, bartender offers them free drinks, listens to their stories, and writes an uncritical, and gushingly glowing book about them!

.

Again, am I critical of every scientist researching racial differences in IQ? Well, yes. However, the problem is not the doing of studies per se, but why you are doing it, what is the goal, and why, and how are you making your results known?

.

IQ Ranges Often Used To Raise Racism Quotient.

We should have reservations about this kind of scientific endeavor in a society where racism has deep, ugly, and violent roots. It is socially divisive, and as far as I have read, the conclusions are not really as sound as science needs to be in such a case. It is steeped in tortured statistical manipulation due to white-privilege, and the significant educational, historical, and cultural baggage in all races. I see the underlying concept of the race IQ research as so corrupting of society that it must be undermined via its sordid history to end its propagation in the forms and forums its currently expressed. Like I did in my over-three centuries’ list above.

.

Additionally, your individual Intelligence Quotient in comparison to others will have the impact it will have. So looking at the IQ averages of certain peoples, of whatever category you choose, provides what kind of advantage, or actionable evidence, and for who? This kind of thinking takes us down a frightening and familiar road. For example, if we discovered, left handed people were on average 2.47% smarter than every right handed person, would we amputate the right hands of our right-handed newborns, just call the procedure an arm circumcision.

.

While that solution and comparison may be ridiculous, consider how the mono-color-culturalists have always used this kind of data, noted in terrible consistency above, and below. Attempts to find the truth of heritable IQs have been woefully ineffective. We have only slogged along or worse, causing much division. If you compared iPhone advancements over the last 10 years, to education in the last 50 years, we would be fluctuating back and forth from the iPhone 2 and iPhone 2.86! This having much to do with local, state and federal current and former segregation policies.

.

Yes, there is no way to stop people from studying and finding out such evidence. The problem is its unreliability over time. Genetic racial differences in IQ have been debunked in various major, and minor ways. James Flynn showed this from the positive side with the changes in IQ over time. Whereas Cyril Burt did it in a disturbing and harmful way.

.

“After the fraud [by Burt] was exposed, Jensen and Eysenck claimed it did not matter too much because many other results backed the role of heredity.” — David Cohen via New Scientist. 1995

.

Realize that my position is not to be that supposed liberal who demands equality of outcomes, a leveler who gives out gold stars to all students, or censors the science, when there is consistent, high quality evidence from many sources. There are other reasons to discount such broad evidence in a practical use, or publicly promoted scenario. And, I am not suggesting these racist and sexist scientists should be censured and censored. Yet….

.

Anyway, who are these liberals or leftists that make the claims, alt-right conservatives accuse us of making? While all kinds can be found in a political party, or other very large groupings of people, please point out these grandiose prophets to me in some quantity, before making such generalized accusations. Otherwise, it is fear mongering for the benefit of your base, who you must think are dumb enough to gulp down your white-supremacist Kook-Aid.

.

First, equality of outcomes is so out of the realm of any reality, I am not sure how conservatives, or racist assholes make these bizarre claims with a straight face. Yet these claims are not made to influence me, or other liberals; it is done to own the libs, which actually means to gin up the base. But I have to give it to the Republicans; they seem to work the Pavlov dog experiment very well on their own supporters. They never do get to own the libs; we merely feel sad for their gullibility.

.

Second, determining the genetic IQ of different races is fraught with significant fault lines that have nothing to do with liberals, equality of outcomes, leveling, or socialism. Why does someone try to discover the Rosetta Stone of racial or gender IQ? I asked this question of one researcher. His answer was obfuscatory, and unsatisfactory. He said something like, “It is what scientists do, discover what no one else knows yet.” Responses similar to Eysenck, above, and Fisher, below.

.

Lastly, I have no problem with that researcher’s general learning about things statement. Yet, it is egregiously not enough in this case. If there was no common practice and overwhelming historical evidence that people of color, are, and were severely denigrated and abused by white supremacy in its various forms, we could go into heritable IQ territory without any worries or problems. But those not taking into consideration the knowledge of our racist history, and facts surrounding it, are real America ignorant, and socially inept scientists. There is no such thing as a color-blind society, and there will never be one until we are truly not seeing color, which I hope is never.

.

A good, antiracist, anti-sexist scientist would probably want to solve big problems not add to them. By that I mean the seeing people of various shades of melanin as we do problem. Recognizing that less than 100 years ago, everything we did as to intelligence investigation was based on fully rotten, childish, specious, and ridiculous methods, when it was race or gender based.

.

To understand how far we have not come from our bad mind science days, phrenology, the study of feeling bumps on the head, was still “practiced” by some “doctors” in the U.S. only a hundred years ago in the ugliest era of Jim Crow. The science of the brain has greatly improved from head bump mapping, but we know the removal of racism and sexism is still moving in slo-mo, or regressing.

.

Our minds were narrowed and manipulated by eons of racism and sexism. Until the mid 20th century, most white men reasoned that all women, and men of all shades of melanin could never learn enough to be scientists in the percentages they are, let alone be good at it. Too much of the white male world is still wrapped in a veil of ignorance as to the female gender. A very large majority of white men still think feminism was mostly about hairy legs and armpits, no bras, looking and dressing butch, and hating men.

.

Can we, the fooled many times white male culture, actually determine whether there is a difference in IQ due to genetics as to gender or race? Our pounded down pathetic prejudices, and myth gullible minds must have damaged our ability, as white men especially, to find a scientific method clean of prejudices, and free of myths on something as wispy thin as a determination of genetic IQ by ancestry differences. After discounting melanin peoples for the most horrifying, and mouth breathing, reasons over centuries, we whiteys are now pure enough to see out of the huge hole we dug? I do not think so!

.

The science around implicit sexism and racism is much deeper and more everyday real than the science of IQ. The scientists who approach this issue with data on IQ, first developed by white men, and eschew the social context, are fooling themselves about their results. If they knew anything about the mind, they would know it regularly plays tricks on our ability to see through or around social constructs. This means these scientists are not just fooling themselves, but they are further adding to the prodigious pile of prejudice bullshit for the amenable, susceptible, and gullible to climb up, and overrun Capitol Hill again, and again.

.

Scientists who refuse to recognize their culpability in furthering the aims of racist insurrectionists will pay the price for their societal ineptness, or many innocent people will. The white people following Trump were incited to riot and kill due to their ginned up worries about the liberal elite and social justice warriors. Quite a bit more benign than the racial dynamic, formed over 400 years. Anyone who is purposely promoting bogus IQ science, unconsciously with implicit bias infested evidence, and without animus but still exacerbating our white supremacy charged environment through their supposed thoughtful inquiry, must understand the consequences of their actions, and pronouncements.

.

Here R.A. Fisher shows the hypocrisy of many IQ scientists. He does not want to promote the science of lung cancer and smoking that can help society, but allowing centuries of racist ideas about intelligence to continue is just fine. There is nothing free or simple about the spreading of racism. Another libertarian fantasy land perspective.

.

Yelling fire in a crowded theater can be against the law, especially if there is no fire. Similarly, no person-of-color scientist would get away with this kind of study with white Americans in some alternate universe. How many black scientists would survive publishing their study results, saying it is “merely about discovering the answers to questions we do not know” –– after their data determined white Americans on average had lower IQs, due to genetics, than melanin-shaded people in their midst? What would the average IQ’d, white supremacist, insurrectionist do to those scientists? Huh.

.

Now, back to reality. Remember there is no two-way street yet in America. The road is still mostly driven on the white side of power. So why should melanin America trust us?

.

Of course, my hypothetical alternate universe question is unanswerable as it is posited, but we know what whites do in certain environments has different consequences than what people of color do, therefore IQ geneticists, white or not, and their propagators must carefully consider their responsibilities. This applies even if everyone laughed at your fire in an actual, crowded-theater “joke” the last time. What theater was it? What is the current, and historical environment like surrounding this issue? Who is in our societal theater?

.

Melanin Science Makes IQ Visible To Racists.

The whole science of melanin drops equal IQ seems like very sketchy science to me, and just SOMEWHAT racist. America used the one-drop (of melanin) rule in its determination of race for over a century. As recently as 1986, Susie Phipps lost her case in Louisiana court, deny her request to be considered white by law. Neither were her children, who all looked white, two with blonde hair and blue eyes.

.

The United States’ Supreme Court would not review Susie’s appeal, so the lower court ruling stood, which determined she was one 32nd black. That is because Susie’s great, great, great, great, grandmother became a freed slave in 1762 after she bore her master four children. And, other than that glaring 32nd amount of melanin, we are a color-blind society. Jesus. That’s fucked up!
.

What if we found out that those with Polish-Irish pastel skin were the smartest peoples on average? For some reason, that is my ethnic heritage. Then the peoples with paisley skin were 2nd smartest. After that it was the plaid skin peoples. And lastly, there are the racist IQ geneticists, flannel skin quasi-peoples. They are the lowest form of super stupid, stupor, stereotypers.

.

How does demeaning the average intelligence of an entire peoples via a “fixed” genetic marker, when they individually have nearly as many by percentage who are kinda smart, average smart, and very smart people as the highest group? For example, group “A” with one per thousand in the highest IQ, versus group “B” with 1.5 per thousand in the highest IQ.

.

What is the societal benefit of prematurely leveling off the life attainment potential of an entire people in such a general way? The finality of the cut off is cruel, merely because of your melanin quota, or place of ancestral origin?!

.

How is the average even a thing when a supposed scientific method is so definitive about such a large group of human beings that can be easily visualized, individualized and coerced, in some form, at any time by the dominant in wealth, power and / or population caste?

.

Such a measurement, likely racist in its development, puts billions of people in one display case for whites to judge as inferior. Those spewing this corrupted innate IQ advantage for whites idea cannot merely wave away the effect of the white supremacist infected, social diagnostic perception.

.

Some other ways to think about the problem. What if IQ measure by melanin-drops geneticists are all racists? What if they are wrong because they have that sneaky unconscious, implicit bias shit going on in their heads? Think of my long list of mostly gents above. What if the science is just plain wrong? Flynn suggested it was. Can anyone guess where that takes us, as we are figuring out the supposed truth? If you read their ad nauseam studies, these researchers never seem to get to the point. If the science was worthwhile, it would be about getting to something worthwhile. What is it?!

.

It is a terrible idea to tell a highly visible group of Americans, who are also a minority, they are the ones that suck the worst amongst all the rest. Adding to that the caste developing these studies happens to have the most power, which they abused horribly in the past, and still do horrible things today, is also unlikely to be a good, long-term societal recipe.

.

Much Unfinished Business.

What about all the unfinished education business in the United States? Almost every advanced nation has been able to ramp up their education for nearly every child in their society. Merely because we are not as homogeneous as other nations, we cannot developed consistently powerful educational opportunities for every student in the “greatest nation ever”? Sad.

.

For about two hundred years, we did little to make better education possible for everyone, and the Southern states made it a very definite goal not to let it happen. After 1965 the South still fought it tooth and nail, and it has let up just somewhat. The North and West dug in their heels for the most part after 1980, first by killing school bussing, and now with segregationist zoning ordinances like only expensive single family homes, and basically grandfathered redlining in or around large urban areas.

.

The natural and urban environment with any people-of-color concentration is also usually substandard, to life threatening. In those places police must arrest black Americans five times more than whites, and kill at 3 times the rate, and courts incarcerate six times more? Much inner city housing for lower income residents are located around asthma factories, indoor lead dispensaries, fuel morbidity refiners, COVID ambulance byways, and wilted of fresh food deserts.

.

How do the neglible differences in “IQ” look after everyone has been raised up on to the same beginning playing field rate, compared to the one noted above? Must we wait until there is a definitive agreement by all white researchers on IQ and genetics, before we do anything as radical as even up the odds as much as possible, the simplest way we know now!? That means by using only money, getting more highly trained teachers, and complementary resources. No great new scientific knowledge is needed to even things up first.

.

Wasting away the lives of millions, for additional generations, for what result? This is not a demand for equality of outcomes and results; save that bullshit bluster and nonsense blather for your next Klan meeting.

.

Again, doing IQ research is fine. But that question must be answered first, why do we need to know more, when we are doing so little to close those gaps in ways we know how? Me thinks my limited IQ knows when someone is putting the wolves over my thighs. The racist IQ push, and putting it out there has nothing to do with science. It is about showing your white supremacist friends you have not forgotten they have fragile egos you must feed.

.

The Pre-Conclusion.

.

Should the IQ truth be stifled?

The truth about the degradation caused our caste system, and the racism surrounding and woven through it, has been stifled for four hundred years. While two wrongs do not make a right, the onus is on the long wrong. Take up that cross, whitey, and bear it, or f-u on your racist IQ truth stifling refrain.

.

Doth I assess too much?

Yes, I obsess about assessing, and I always will; damn you shallow thinkers!

.

What if IQ differences by melanin are actually true?

We have been going at education, and developing our society in a segregated format for too long. Emphasizing your truth merely to send a message, or some other lame reason is white-privilege speaking. This debate has been corrupted since at least John Locke, 350 years ago. We should come up with a better plan to implement the changes in education we already know are needed overall, and for each individual, not determine who is five points higher or lower, by their shade of skin color, or origin as a group!

.

What are scientists getting wrong, and how?

Science is very hard. Many people are skeptical of it. Some completely deny it in a few, or all instances. The thoroughly damaged field of racist intelligence science is as old as our nation. It seems hard for IQ racist scientists to understand the hurt they continue to bring. Some mono-color-culture influenced scientists are unconsciously biased; others have a conscious supremacist leaning, or worse. Often it is hard to tell them apart. The scientists who feign ignorance of the damage they inflict by their arrogant pronouncements are much too quick to excuse their culpability in perpetuation of racist tropes and fascist policies. Get woke, or get gone.

.

Do mono-color-culturalists really suck as much as it seems?

I want to give a good review here, as I am of the dominant hue, yet do not think we are of hue, group. Yet we are good people, except maybe for what is in our bones, hearts, and minds. We have a penchant for seeming above it all, while we wallow in our dominance drunkenness. The appropriate question is not whether we suck; though there is no doubt it is true. The better question would be, how long can we cover up the fact that we suck so bad by employing our racist IQ scientific team, which is our last hope for continuing our dominant mono-ness?

.

Where does the mono-color-culture want to take us?

While the story of the lemmings is a false flag allegory, we will find that cliff anyway if we are just given more time. Mono-color-culturalists are the embodiment of the lemmings myth. Look at the Roman and British Empires, what colossal collapses, but hey that is superior western thought, culture, and society for you. Mono-ness is as arrogant, and future-oriented as a burlap sack of lemmings weighed down by rocks in a lake, while a host of who-really-cares’ crickets fiddle around as everything short-sighted mono-color-culture has burned.

.

Why are these mono-color-culturalists so persistent?

They know their time is nigh. They fear their own shadows. They have nothing but arrogance to make them whole. They rely on sleight of hand and finding superiority wherever it can be fabricated, and extracted by force, and myths. Weaving together the old into the new, and making it seem like they were not making it up in the first place, and now have actually scientifically discovered the secret to being justified in their mono-color-culturalist arrogance.

.

Did Japheth not like Ham, or was his brother kosher to him?

You may not realize that this is often the hardest question for me to answer, but it all just came flooding back to me. My knowledge of The Curse of Ham was little more than a trichinosis joke. However, I do Noah little more about it. What I do know is that Cain was unable to do anything because he was dead by then, though still known for being the ablest murderer around. These family affair warfares are very pun, and tricky; I knows it. I should also mention Shem due to him playing a minor role in this brothers’ trilogy, and its three-part disharmony.

.

And other tales of their evolutionary tails. I would rather not quit with a butt end of a joke, but rear we are anyway.

.

The Real Conclusion.

L’il ole me, has no power to stop the study of anything. That being said, the whole conversation and the application must change significantly around the search for any genetic and racial origins of intelligence. That is because people with melanin are already disenfranchised from many things due to our foundational mono-color-culturalist arrogance, and supposed superiority. This belief system has been violently, and explicitly fostered in the past, often implicitly encouraged today, and explicitly refuses to remove any piled-up-over-centuries’ grime. It is counterproductive to mix in highly volatile, suspiciously racist research, particularly with little being done to end our current transgressions, or redress our past crimes.

.

For example, there is a massive math problem none of these scientists, and conservative pundits can attribute to IQ, or lack of it. There is no difference in IQ that can, or ever will prove to be more than a scintilla of a factor in this racist born and raised math problem. Americans of African descent have one tenth the wealth of whites. Please solve this monetary math problem before you tell me IQ has anything to do with anything. Only a total dumb ass professor, or IQ geneticist would attribute such dramatic, and traumatic differences to anything but our continuing systemic racism problem.

.

Math Crib-sheet: racial wealth disparities causes include the Homestead Act a.k.a. Texas and California-sized, whites welfare program, land giveaway, Reconstruction’s Mule and Acres Option Fail, and FHA redlining Housing Segregation — which is why school bussing was required.

.

Whether the data is there for IQ differences, I cannot be sure. However, we know white supremacy in some of its worst forms are still present that have nothing to do with test taking. Anyone with an IQ, knows that Confederate statues, and flags are meant to intimidate every person with melanin no matter how much their IQ overpowers their white mono-color-culture fellow citizen oppressors. Whether whites who protect those racist statues, and must wave their hate-filled flags, have an IQ that registers at all, should be finalized before we proceed any further.

.

In a quote above I noted how Jensen and Eysenck were fine with using some of Burt’s faked, or inaccurate data. Others like Flynn (below), and Gottfredson have defended the use of suspicious data, or working with others in the professionwho tend towards a white supremacist take on IQ. The problem is where does this weaving into the past crap get us?

.

Above Flynn is basically saying without white supremacists hanging around for another couple millennia, he or we would never learn anything new. Such a weenie way to justify the existence of Jensen’s work or his place in history. Did Flynn know that correlation is not necessarily causation? Or from a personal perspective, I could say, I am glad Hitler lived until at least late 1943 so my father could be a hero, fighting antisemitism, like he was. I know Flynn did not really mean it like that, but is there not at least an alternative to that type of white supremacist collaboration today? Please!

.

The white supremacist cries of political correctness crowd out the need for societal correctives their ancestors constructed, and the current group still holds together. There may be benefits in the long term to knowing the Nth degree of IQ by melanin drops, or lack thereof. However, there has been no case made for its value in such an uneven society that was bred from race hate, and purposeful discrimination that had no IQ science justifying its value. Determining IQ by race is jumping from multiple centuries of fires into incalculable, societal frying pans.

.

Those racist rules were established and enforced, with similar enforcements and effects today, using near zero-knowledge of different cultures, and pure, just make money, quackery. Now we are at a time when we can change the archaic discrimination dynamic, and the IQ Nazis want to shut the other door on people of color using racial singed science?! I say racist bullshit on that; unless there is a much better plan than merely doing science for science sake!

.

If you are a white male, maybe consider getting in another line of work. Those whiteys who choose to become IQ genetic researchers should take a battery of implicit bias tests, until your IQ ego is battered into reality. As we should screen out sociopaths from being on police forces, so we should disallow racists from doing any IQ research. But if you would rather go all James Watson white supremacist on genetics, I say we fire your ass. Try to shrug THIS off, white-privileged ass-hat!

.

Racists should not be allowed to pursue racist IQ data in any major firm or educational institution, and then have the power to promote it. There have been enough of these whiteys messing shit up already. We can find enough non-racists to do the work, or we will continue as a white supremacist, arrogant asshole society.

.

This whole proposition of a racial difference in IQ is merely a refresher course in John Locke’s theories on race inferiorities stuffed in an Excel spreadsheet. Those fascist philosophes, scientific racists, and current IQ geneticists noted in my list fit on the Smell Curve of unreliability. Their white supremacist bias is self-evident in the rotten Smell Curve of racist intelligence history and theory.

.

By Richard The Chwalek.

Books I have consumed. Some Medium articles are on my blog, and a few not here.